a Taj MuttHall Dog Diary: Regionals
Showing posts with label Regionals. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Regionals. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 04, 2012

Vacation Day 2: Gold PDCH, Family, and Irrigation

SUMMARY: Not a lot to tell. Happy.

So, then, Sunday was Day 2. My club has been hosting USDAA Labor Day trials, then Regionals, every year since at least 1995. It's our big event of the year. And I decided to skip all four days of it...

Oh, except then I decided to enter just one Snooker on Sunday...oh, and since that was the 2nd class of the day, I might as well enter the first class, Jumpers, because Boost maybe someday will get another Jumpers Q and Tika usually Qs in Jumpers.

I already mentioned the result of Tika's Snooker run (the Gold level Performance Championship).

The earlier part of the day went like this:

* Tika, smooth but not super-fast Jumpers course and a Q. Turns out it was apparently a hard course to Qualify in, so we ended up placing 3rd of 17 dogs! Good old Tika. (We were 7th fastest, but 5 of those had faults.)

* Boost, Jumpers--one bar, one runout, and a big spin in two different places where she didn't read a cross correctly. No Q.

* Boost, Snooker--spot-on opening of 8 obstacles, then a refusal on a tight wrappy front cross to #2 in the closing. Lately I've been trying to pick courses that I think that we can get through instead of trying to get high scores, and hoping that at some point we'll do it and it will be enough for a SuperQ anyway. But on this one, even if we had finished, our total score would've been too low for a SuperQ. No Q.

I was done competing before noon! And I felt barely a tingle of regret for not having signed up for the rest of the weekend--wasn't sure how I'd feel, but at that point, it was SO NICE to have accomplished the major goal, to be done for the weekend and not have to get up early again, to avoid the evening traffic, and to still have weekend ahead of me.

One of my sisters drove all the way down to see us run--she jumps on her horse, so the games we play (Snooker and Gamblers are the ones we watched some of) are different from what they do, but she gets the idea of the competition. We were then able to stop and have a nice lunch at the Black Bear Diner (well--we both had breakfast, but it was lunchtime). That was sweet--I hardly ever get a chance to talk to this sister.

Then I went home, started sorted and processing photos from the day before and that morning, took a nap, and worked on the dang irrigation.

Sometime I'll post something about that, really I will.

Went to bed feeling decently happy.

Wednesday, September 07, 2011

Weekend Steeplechase and Grand Prix Report

SUMMARY: with videos
Actually I don't have all that much to report.

SW Regional Steeplechase Round 1


I think the toughest spot was getting the dog into the right (right) side of the tunnel, but if you launched the dog to the jump after the Aframe and then turned and ran straight (as I did), you'd be aiming the dog straight at the correct side of the tunnel. It was a smooth and doable course--about half the dogs made it to Round 2.

Tika did fine, placing 5th of 16. But then, so did most everyone else in her 22" Performance group: 10 advanced to the second round.

However, in watching videos, I notice that she seems to hesitate or slow in several places in such a way that makes me think "she's not getting the right information from me fast enough." I've thought for quite a while that she's slowed down to accommodate me rather than me learning to handle her speed (and I fear that Boost may be getting to the same place, dang). This video shows it in several places. (And again we won't mention standing up at the start line to sniff for treats--)



Boost's run--well--some nice bits, except when I had to yank on every invisible rope in the universe to get her to come in over the 3rd jump in the pinwheel--a known issue, when she's blasting full speed ahead and I ask her to come back in to me (e.g., with serpentines, too), she keeps runnning in a big loop rather than trying to come in over the jump that's between us. And immediately thereafter runs past the 4th jump in the pinwheel. Yeh, could be she's not getting the info she needs either. Plus two knocked bars, the second on a rear cross after which she pulled in to me instead of going over the next jump that was, yes, right in front of her.



For comparison, here's our classmate Kicks! winning that class (22" chamionship). 30 of the 60 22" dogs moved up.


Grand Prix Final

I tried to push myself and Tika as hard as I could. Funny, watching the video, I look like I'm just loping along, but I *felt* like I was running all out. I clapped my hands a whole lot more than I think I usually do. Also funny, Tika's weaves look fast in the video, but the difference between hers and Boost's is amazing--with Boost, I have to run full speed to get to the other end before she does, but with Tika, I just jog gently.

We ended up 3rd, but the Malinois and Border Collie who beat us were 5 (!) and 4 seconds faster than we were. Still, we easily qualified for the Nationals Semifinals--but, no, we're not going to Kentucky.

(Will add map when available.)

Tuesday, September 06, 2011

Weekend Snooker Report

SUMMARY: With videos.

Team Snooker:
This was a 3 or 4 reds class; I couldn't come up with anything I liked with 4 reds that was comfortable enough for Team, so I opted for 3 (with 6-7-7 in the opening):
  • Tika: When I sent her to one red and then turned and ran, she turned also before taking the red and I had to get her turned back around to take it. As a result, we ran out of time partway through #7 in the closing, which dropped us from winning to 4th of 13 dogs.
  • Boost did an OK opening, but then, in a weird flashback to last weekend where #4 in the closing was also two jumps and the first one was also basically parallel to our path, I did not succeed in pushing her out over the jump for a refusal, so whistled off. 
Sunday Masters/P3 Snooker:
This one had only 3 reds--thank goodness, I'm just tired of always having to decide whether a 4th red will help me or hurt me on top of the basic strategy. I had a 7-7-7 (double tunnels) opening plan for 51 pts and a 7-7-5 (5 was Aframe) opening plan for 49 pts. I figured that the first was completely doable for a fast dog but probably not for Tika any more, so didn't want to try it unless I had to (meaning other dogs had done it successfully).
  • By the time Tika ran, most of the dogs in her class had already run and only one--a very fast Catahoula--had gotten the 51, and the next highest was 46. I wanted Top Ten points, but decided that 2nd place (for 5 top tens) would be plenty good enough and stuck with the 7-7-5. We made it with only a couple of seconds to spare, so I'm glad I didn't get greedy. (We won't mention where she stood up from her down-stay to go searching for treats. At least she didn't take off after me.) And look at that nice right-angle rear cross approach to the weaves! She's such a good girl.

  • By the time Boost ran, there were already 9 dogs with 51 points, and only 12 super-Qs available, so I went for the 7-7-7 plan. I was glad to get all the way through it with her--unfortunately, we ran out of time as we started our final #7. That's because we had trouble getting to and from the farthest red (the 3rd one we did), plus she turned the wrong way after #2, slowed to look at me for a while before #4, turned in front of me before going to the weaves at #6 and all those little things added up to the time we needed to complete the course. So 44 points for a Q but no Super-Q. Frustratingly, no one else got 51 and a 49 (my 7-7-5 plan) would've been a superQ. So close!

Monday Masters/P3 Snooker:
3 or 4 reds again. I decided on a 6-7-7-2 plan for the opening.
  • Boost: A couple of wide turns, a knocked red that I recovered from but not gracefully, she didn't catch a rear cross and turned the wrong way--again, we got through to #7 and ran out of time about pole #7 of 12, sigh. In this case, Super-Qs were 52 points, so even if we'd completed the weaves, without our 4th red and that extra 2 points, we'd have not Super-Qed. But so close...but just a 43-point Q. But check out those great, difficult sends to the weave poles then executed at a distance! Happy weave pole mom!

     
  • Tika: Well, after that first red where I pulled boost between the next red and the Aframe to the teeter? I pulled Tika the same way but hadn't stepped far enough towards the Aframe, so instead of the teeter, she did the red. Whistle. Crap.

Monday, September 05, 2011

Weekend Quick Summary

SUMMARY: USDAA Southwest Regional is over.
I am pooped.

Tika, competing in 22" Performance,  Qed 12 of 15 Q-able rounds (but sadly only one of the two dang Snookers I was hoping to collect some Top Ten points on), and placed:
  • 4th of 13 in team gamblers, jumpers, and snooker
  • 2nd of 13 team standard
  • 5th of 16 round 1 steeplechase
  • 3rd of 29 in team relay w/teammate Brenn
  • 5th overall in team (29 teams) w/Brenn
  • 3rd of 17 in sunday's jumpers
  • 2nd of 17 in sun's Snooker (super-Q)
  • 3rd of 15 in sun's standard
  • 4th of 16 in gamblers
  • 2nd of 14 in mon's standard
  • 2nd of 12 in mon's jumpers
  • 3rd of 13 in the Grand Prix regional final round, yeah!
The one Snooker Q completed her Perf Snooker Ch Silver (25 Qs) -- now she needs only one more Standard for her Performance silver ADCH, which would match her Champion Silver ADCH.


In steeplechase round 2, she was doing great until she really whacked a foot (or two?) on the broad jump and slowed almost to a stop, so lost time plus the faults, so no $$ for us this time around.

But overall, I think I could safely say that she had a good weekend.

Boost, meanwhile, Qed in pairs Backfill: oops, updated 9/6 9a.m: and both Snookers (but not Super-Qs).

And there we have the weekend in a nutshell.

Friday, September 02, 2011

Soutwest Regional Preview a la Taj MuttHall

SUMMARY: Statistics, titles, blah blah blah.

First, of course, the agility wonk combs the Bay Team archives to compare this year's Regional to prior years. Think back! Reminisce on all those fun times!

Number of entries (dogs) is about the same this year as last; runs are more I think because of the addition of the Friday night IHC classes.

YearDogs EnteredRunsDaysRingsSiteJudges
2011 340 3475 3.5 5/4 Manzanita Park Prunedale Tom Shultz, Tammy Domico, Evelyn Robertson, Jessica Ajoux, Leslie Bickel
2010 331 2913 3 5/4 Manzanita Park Michelle DuBois, Tom Kula, Evelyn Robertson, Les Sanders, Karen Gloor
2009* 426 3577 3 5/4 Manzanita Park Scott Chamberlain, Mark Wirant & Sharon Wirant, Adrienne Lynch, Tammy Domico
2008* 484 4183 3 4 Manzanita Park Scott Chamberlain, Mark Wirant & Sharon Wirant, Adrienne Lynch, Karen Gloor, Tammy Domico
2007* 527 4896 3 4 Twin Creeks S'vale Scott Chamberlain, Mark Wirant & Sharon Wirant, Sandra Katzen
2006* 475 4863 3 4 Twin Creeks Scott Chamberlain, Kim Donnell, Frank Holik, Sandra Katzen*, *Scott supv
2005* 467 4348 3 4 Twin Creeks Tom Kula, Peggy Hammond, Merlene Stiles, Jim Hibbard,*Candy Gaiser and Merlene Stiles supv
2004* 415 3939 3 4 Twin Creeks Patty Drom, Jean McKenzie, Debbie Berkley*, Chris Vaught*, *Candy Gaiser and Patty Drom supv
2003 293 2583 3 4 Twin Creeks Janet Gauntt, Frank Holik, Valerie Reiner, Tim Verrelli
2002 335 1260 (?) 3 4 Cal State Hayward Harry Guticz, Lori Montana, Eric Bruce*, Dave Grubel, *Candy Gaiser supv
2001* (non-Reg.) 375 2961 3 3? Cal State Hayward Darlene Woz, Debbie Berkley, Gary Visintainer, Tom Schulz
* West Coast Nationals

And how about this year?

Of the 340 dogs entered, 159 will be Border Collies, one of them a very cute and hopefully not bar-knocking Booster-Girl!

The next-most-common group are the All Americans, 14 of which registered as such, but also these highly individualized designer breeds:
  • 3 Aussie Kelpie
  • 2 Border Kelpie
  • Border Aussie
  • Border Corgi
  • Border Staffy
  • BC/Australian Cattle Dog
  • BC Mix
  • Beagle mix
  • Chihuahua mix
  • Craussie (that would be Teeeeeeka!)
  • Eskie-huahua
  • Pinchippet (min pin/chihuahua/whippet)
  • Rock'n'Roll Retriever
  • Shelt-inu
  • Siberian Bulldozer
  • Sweet L'l Monster
  • Uma Thurman Dog

Weather

We are expected fog and overcast all weekend, woo-hoo, maybe Tika will run fast!

Dogs per group and age

No, no, I'm not going to do all of them...you can go download the interesting statistics list or the running order catalog if you really want to, from The Bay Team's event page.

But I will note that Tika, in P3 22", will be competing in a group of 12 to 17 dogs (hrmhrm top mumble ten points hrmmmm).

Boost's group size is around 80 dogs. Dang 22" Masters.

As for age groups (not an offical group, but fun to note anyway): 41 dogs Boost's age, 14 Tika's age, and only 11 dogs older than Tika (out of the 340 entered). The largest age group is age 4, with 56 dogs.

Ring conflicts

I've been so spoiled by rotation groups, which many clubs use around here for the larger trials (which includes most of ours and SMART's). No conflicts, ever. But last weekend they did NOT run rotation groups, and since they tended to split the rings like this: 22/26" masters and everyone else -- that put Boost and Tika into different groups and I hardly had a moment to sit down. As score table czar, I think I missed two entire classes (run one dog in one ring, run the other in the other ring, run the 2nd one in the first ring, run the first one in the second ring...).

I also managed to miss one walkthrough entirely, and missed another walkthrough later but at least got to walk that one with the different group and just ran my dog late.

This weekend we'll largely be doing rotation groups, but one class each day is split the same way as last weekend, so I'll be back to managing conflicts.

And what about the Merle Girls?

15-16 runs for Tika, 14-15 for Boost (depending on Steeplechase Round 2); Boost didn't earn a single Grand Prix Q all year, so she's not eligible to run Grand Prix this weekend, whereas Tika earned a bye (3 of them, actually) into round 2 so doesn't have to run round 1 at all.

That makes, for me -- ergh-- well, a lot of running and hope the knee & hips continue to hold up, is all I can say! And we didn't even sign up for the two classes offered on Friday night.

Possible titles:
  • Tika: Perf Snooker Champion Silver (one needed, two chances)
  • Boost: Standard Champion Bronze (one needed, two chances)
  • Boost: Snooker Master (two super-Qs needed, two chances) (I must add, "when heck freezes over")
  • Boost: Jumpers Master (two needed, two chances) (and, yeh, ditto)
  • Boost: If she completes the latter two--ADCH. (Gosh, how weird to even be able to say that it's within statistical possibility, because for so long it hasn't been! Of course when I say "within statistical possibility," in this case it's like the statistical possibility of Tika fetching the newspaper on command...well, OK, actually, it's more likely than that. But that still doesn't make it very likely.)
OK, Agility Boys and Girls, that's plenty for now. Wishing you all a wonderful Labor Day weekend.

Tuesday, August 31, 2010

Southwest Regionals: A look back

SUMMARY: It's small, for a big trial.
Updates!: Got more info from Karey and my own research later the same day, in red like this, and lots of tweaks throughout that I didn't mark. Basically the article is the same, just some dates are adjusted.

This weekend in Prunedale California, the Bay Team hosts its 8th annual USDAA Southwestern (Major) Regional dog agility trial. Before the Major Regionals existed, however, the Bay Team had been hosting Labor Day weekend trials since 1995. Their content, size, and location have varied over the years, and it's fun to sometimes look back and remember how things used to be.

Note: Prior to 2003, the Regional qualifiers for each Tournament were held in different locations on different dates, and the Bay Team hosted one each year for a couple or three years. Herein, I'm talking about the Major Regionals started in 2003, in which all three Tournament events occur.

Tournament offered

From 1995 through 2002 (before Major Regionals), the various clubs in central California rotated the local tournament classes. Each year, one club hosted a Grand Prix, one hosted a Steeplechase, and one hosted a Dog Agility Masters (DAM) Tournament. To our modern agility minds, that seems so odd; all these same clubs now offer both Grand Prix and Steeplechase at virtually every trial, and there are maybe half a dozen DAMs during the year as well.

So, in 1996, 1998, and 2001, we offered a DAM at our Labor Day trial; in 1999, it was a Steeplechase; and in 2000, because of the Nationals the next weekend (see below), we offered no tournaments at all that weekend.

Of course, qualifying for nationals has changed dramatically as well. In 1996, for example, you could still qualify for Nationals in Grand Prix with a single Q, and you could get that single Q with as many as 10 faults. Then it changed to 7 faults, then 5 faults, then to two clean-run Qs. Therefore, people need more attempts to earn those requisite scores.

That first Major Regional, in 2003, when we were required to host ALL THREE TOURNAMENTS IN ONE WEEKEND, OH MY GOSH!, raised quite a controversy. We'd never even hosted all three tournaments in a single YEAR before! It would be too much work, too  complicated, people wouldn't want that much stress on the weekend, too hard to handle all the special awards...  You get the picture.

Who knew we'd be doing this for 8 years running, with no  end in sight! Yep,  we cheerfully run that complicated, stressful, impossible  slate of classes every Labor Day without a whimper.  Well--maybe one or two whimpers here and there; this isn't an easy trial, but the processes are pretty well  understood and we have many enthusiastic and experienced members who see to all the details. Thanks Dog for that!

Location

In the heavily populated area where the majority of Bay Teamers live, vast swaths of grass or large arenas are hard to come by. In 1995 and 1996, the Labor Day trial used a small field in Daly City and shared a parking lot with the local library. The next year we moved to Cal State Hayward (CSUH, now Cal State East Bay) on the big lawn next to Meiklejohn Hall. Parking wasn't convenient and it was hard to get vehicles on and off the lawn for unloading.

In our eternal quest for a better space, we managed to get the 1998 trial onto the Stanford campus. Stanford has miles of lush, green lawns crying out for dog agility. We had a great spot until a couple of days before the trial, when someone getting married on campus insisted that their wedding not have a view of dog agility, and we were unceremoniously and abruptly dumped to a tiny lawn between a busy street and some residence units. 6:00 a.m. weekend dogs didn't mix well with the sleepers.

That was our only trial ever to be televised--what a mess! Although it was fun afterward to be on T.V. for 30 seconds (Jake and me after our DAM relay run),  the huge delays in classes while the TV crew set things up the way they wanted made the days drag on much longer than expected; we couldn't use the loudspeakers while they were running the cameras (which was during most of the classes); and we had to wait at the ends of classes for them to interview folks coming off the field.

The next two years, 1999 and 2000, we were back at Meiklejohn, but then the campus wanted to build there. We moved to the CSUH soccer practice field for 2001 and 2002. That had more space, but was inconveniently laid out and had challenging parking and access. We never held a major Retional there.

Then we were able to negotiate to use the soccer fields at the Twin Creeks Softball complex in the heart of Silicon Valley, making it delightfully convenient for a large number of Bay Team members. The space was huge, but overnight parking was always iffy; the management team changed frequently and we got different stories at different times; their rules and restrictions were a bit of a thorn in our side at times; and when listening to their rates, we always heard ka-ching! ka-ching! Still, that's where we held our first major Regional, and we easily fit there for five years of Regionals, from 2003 to 2007.

We might still have been there, except that in 2008, after confirming our trials for the year, management abruptly changed and confirmed that the long-rumored additional softball fields would be built on *our* soccer fields and that they were no longer available.

Meanwhile, SMART had found Manzanita Park in Prunedale. The facilities are vast, nowhere near anyone's residence, and not too expensive. Our Labor Day trials have been there since 2008.

Number of rings

Our first Labor Day trial, in 1995, had only two rings. The following year, because USDAA didn't allow entry limits and entries had been growing in this still-new dog sport, we bumped it up to three rings. The arguments that ensued when three whole rings were proposed--oh, my! It was already hard to find workers, people were already encountering ring conflicts, it was already too stressful, it was too hard to manage. But the club did it, and it worked out just fine, and it wasn't long until all our trials ran 3 rings.

In 2000, the USDAA Nationals moved to California, and we anticipated a huge draw to our trial because it was the weekend immediately preceding the Nationals. Rather than cancel it, we cut it back to two days (the only time we've done that for Labor Day). The next year, Nationals was later in the month, but our trial was so popular (in addition to being a Regional Steeplechase qualifier that year), that it was proposed that we bump ours up to four whole rings. The arguments that ensued--oh, my! It was already hard to find workers, people were already encountering ring conflicts, it was already too stressful, it was too hard to manage... Yeah, we know.

So we did four rings, and it worked reasonably well (rotation groups introduced several years later really helped) and we continued to do four-ring trials until we moved to Manzanita Park in 2008--where we threw in, yes, a fifth ring on one of the 3 days, which has helped enormously with rotation groups.

Number of runs & dogs

Sometimes it's hard to say why the numbers grow or fall they way they do. Of course the number of runs could vary with how many classes we offer, but we've been pretty consistent with that through our years of regionals.

Our last pre-Regional Labor Day trial, in 2001 (the 2nd year of Nationals in southern California), we had 2961 runs.

In 2002 and 2003, the Nationals moved to Texas.

In 2004 through 2009, the Nationals were in Scottsdale, which Californians generally considered to be a "local" trial, so not surprisingly the Regional numbers jumped way up. The Bay Team Regionals were the last before the Nationals each year, so we expected, and generally got, huge entries.

Amazing, looking back at the number of runs (including Round 2 of Grand Prix or Steeplechase except of course for this year):

yeardogsrunsRingsRegional?LocationNationals in--
20103312835+round2's5YPrunedaleKentucky
200942637825YPrunedaleScottsdale
200848441835YPrunedaleScottsdale
200752748964YTwin CrksScottsdale
200647548634YTwin CrksScottsdale
200546843484YTwin CrksScottsdale
200441541434YTwin CrksScottsdale
200329325834YTwin CrksTX
20023351260?4**CSUH soccerTX
200137929334-CSUH soccerDel Mar, CA
20003141503*3-CSUH Meik.Del Mar, CA
199933223993-CSUH Meik.
199821817313-Stanford
1997~10003-CSUH Meik.
1996~138~8703-Daly City
19952-Daly City
* 2000: Only 2 days, no Tournaments

** regional for one tournament only

Not sure why the drop in 2008 and again in 2009; we offered the same number of classes, but Pairs  moved to Friday evening, which might have been part of (but not nearly all) of the drop.

My own thoughts are that (a) the economy played a part in what people could afford, and (b) people were self-selecting out of going to the Nationals and so weren't as concerned about picking up Regional runs.

This year, the 2835 number is the lowest that we've had since our abbreviated trial in 2000! But it's not unexpected, now that Nationals have moved back towards the east.

This should make for a relaxed weekend--at least compared to some of our most jam-packed prior Labor Day weekends--and I can use some relaxing at a trial! See you all there.