a Taj MuttHall Dog Diary: statistics
Showing posts with label statistics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label statistics. Show all posts

Friday, September 27, 2019

That Addiction Thing

SUMMARY: Summary of my agility years
Facebook: Partially posted there Sept 27 '19. Edited here.

I might have covered this in previous posts. Who knows?!

Another handler posted a "warning" to a new competitor in a Facebook agility group that she started in agility just for something fun to do with her dog—and 10 years later she's an addict.


Hahahahaha!!! (I laugh with her, I'm sure...)

I know so many who are (or have been) in the same camp! In 1995 my life was full—work, house remodel, writing fiction, activities with spouse--and I was training hard with my dog (Remington) in Obedience, aiming for a championship, a goal since my childhood. But it wasn't enough for him (brain or physically)—I had abandoned tracking after 16 weeks (Note to self: to look up--have I written about that before?**), and I'd taught him more tricks than any classes were offering, so I signed up for a 6-week agility class for what-the-heck after urging from one of my obedience instructors. And...

I loved it. The connection with my dog; learning so much more about training and behavior!; The physical & mental challenges for both of us; increased fitness; so many new friends around the country; so many places visited, and...

Dogs #2 and #1 (Jake and Remington, 2002)
Easy to be happy when you've had a good weekend, earned a championship, and have a Human Mom with treats.


After the first year, I started a database of every run.

After 19 years, 4 dogs, nearly 300 weekends* of competitions (and a gazillion classes, seminars, and practices), a full set of agility equipment, buying a house and vehicle to accommodate the activities, around 4700 runs*, multiple nationals competitions*, 160ish titles* (counting everything* at all levels including CH's, Top Ten, Lifetime awards), thousands of ribbons* (yes, I brought them all home: doh!)—and, you know, we never talk about $$$ — only my body stopped me. And I'm far from being one of the most successful or addicted handlers.

What's your story?


Dog #3 (Tika 2008): What it big deal is? I is fun just having.
Plus fun Steeplechase check is gots.


Dog #4 (Boost 2011) -- Is good girl was do. Why Human Mom using is annoying face-machine?

ALL the ribbon things


* And, yes, the database can give me almost exact numbers and tiny details. If I want. To be. Obsessive. Which I never. Am. Never.

** Yes, I have mentioned tracking before.  Here  and a BRAND NEW POST for 1995!

Tuesday, July 23, 2013

Musing on Boost's SuperQs and Other Qing Statistics

SUMMARY: Why we don't have SuperQs

It's because we can't get through a course without a fault. As I said the other day, it's not that I'm trying to do courses that I think are very hard for us--I always default to courses that I think we're capable of doing that are still in Super-Q range. I'm not trying to *win*, ever. But the bars and the (often inexplicable to me) refusals do us in.

Tika was 5 when she finally got her 3rd SQ, and it had seemed like *forever*. The difference between Tika and Boost is that Tika pretty regularly finished one or two spots out of the SQs, whereas Boost and I almost never completely get through the course at all. Seems to me that most dogs who regularly get through Snooker courses usually get their SuperQs eventually.

Of the 113 Masters Snookers that Boost and I have attempted, 25 have been Qs--which isn't great--22%--but given that judges seem to aim for 25% of dogs Qing on any given course, I guess that's not too bad.

But getting the SuperQ by being in the top 15% of of those competing...

Among our 25 Snooker Qs, we have only EVER gotten through a complete course four times. Ever. Two of those were our two SuperQs and the other two were enough points for a SQ but missed it based on time that we wasted on course (in other words, tied with a dog on points but they had a faster time so got the superQ).

Again, it's not like we can't get through them in time or can't logically get through them--there are another 10 where we've completed our entire chosen course and finished the closing, but knocked a bar somewhere in the opening.

So getting through the course error-free is our biggest challenge. I think that dogs who can get through their planned courses regularly are much likelier to get their SQs quicker, even if they're not aggressive on points.

OK, that's enough about Snooker for the moment.

Perhaps I should move on to pondering why we've only ever Qed in Jumpers six out of 127 times (under 5%), which ultimately is what keeps us from earning our lifetime bronze award (which requires 15).

Really, maybe she should've been a herding dog. Good thing she's cute and loves to be active and engaged.

(photo by Sarah H.)

Boost's USDAA Qing percentages:
  • Jumpers: 5%
  • Grand Prix: 10%
  • Gamblers: 12%
  • Standard: 14%
  • Steeplechase: 14%
  • Snooker: 22%
  • DAM Team Tournament: 38%
  • Pairs Relay: 47%

Thursday, July 18, 2013

Another Agility Weekend--That's Three

SUMMARY: Three-day USDAA in Prunedale

I've been trying to avoid doing more than 2 weekends in a row of agility, because more than that deeply wears on me these days. But when there are three local trials in a row, I just gotta do it. This is the third of the three, and thank goodness I'll have next weekend free to catch up on life. And I've been trying to avoid doing all three days of 3-day trials, but, well, a woman's got to do what a woman's got to do.



Time for statistics about this weekend's entries! Because I love this stuff.
  • 89 Border Collies, 30 Australian Shepherds, 19 All Americans (mixed breeds), 11 Shetland Sheepdogs, and 50 other dogs covering 29  breeds.
  • 147 people, of whom 94 entered one dog, 46 entered two, and 7 who entered three! Crazy people!
  • 20 are men.  That's 13%, or about 1/8 of the competitors.
  • The most populous dog age group is the 4-year-olds, with 30 dogs, followed by the 8-year-olds (including Boost) with 25, then the 6-year-olds with 23. Odd distribution, if you ask me.
  • The oldest dog entered is 13, and there are two 12-year-olds (including Tika).
  • The top dog name is Quinn/Quin with 4. 
  • Dog names, 2 each: Bounce, Dash, Kyna, Lark, Lily, Maddie, Sydney, Toby, and Trick.
  • The top human name is Lisa with 6, closely followed by Kathy with 5. I guess all the Lauras must be doing something else this weekend.
  • There will be 1875 runs over the three days, distributed across three rings. My dogs account for 21 of them.
  • The farthest travelers are two folks from Oregon and one from Arizona. Next about 4 from southern California. The rest I think are from within 4 hours of here, and mostly within about 2 hours.
  • It takes me about 45 minutes to get there in the morning, 55-60 to get home in the evening.
See y'all there--figuratively, anyway, because as usual my head will be down at a score table. Yeah!


Friday, April 19, 2013

The Oldest Dog

SUMMARY: Twelve.
It has finally happened. The statistics are out for the SMART USDAA trial coming a week from now. One hundred and eighty-one dogs are entered. When counted by age, the oldest age group is 12 years old. There's only one dog in that group.

Oh, Tika. Sigh.



Oh, and there's only one Craussie, too. Tika sure is unique.


(Key for those not familiar with dog-breed abbreviations: BC/Border Collie. JRT/Jack Russell Terrier. Terv/Belgian Tervuren. Aussie/Australian Shepherd. Sheltie/Shetland Sheepdog. ADC/Australian Cattle Dog. Beardie/Bearded Collie. Pyr Shep/Pyrenean Shepherd. DSFarmdog/Danish-Swedish Farmdog (yes it's a real breed).  GSD: German Shepherd Dog. PWD: Pembroke Welsh Corgi.)

Thursday, February 07, 2013

VAST USDAA Trial This Weekend

SUMMARY: It has been a while!

The statistics are in; the running orders are posted online, and I have downloaded and printed my copy.

For this weekend's trial:

DayTotal  RunsSteeplechase/
Grand Prix
StartersAdvanced Masters
Saturday66583  (St)8577420
Sunday42585 (GP)5149240


In Masters, the 420 runs are in 5 different classes (Standard, Jumpers, Gamblers, etc.), so that's about 84 dogs per class.  Of those 84, about 40 are in Boost's jump height, so competing directly with her. Or we're competing with them. WHY did I get a 22"-jumping dog??

Now, in *Tika's* jump height, there are 11 or 12! That's actually a huge number for that group! Whoo, if we place we could get a ton of Top Ten points...

Oh.

Nevvvvverrrr miiiiiiiiind.

I'm thinking of taking a retirement cake if I have time tomorrow to pick one up somewhere.

Funny the difference between masters and the lower levels. There are about 15 dogs in advanced, 17 in Starters. Among those, apparently there will be a few friends running their young dogs for the first time this weekend. Always exciting.

I'm having to remember all the things about going to a competition. Three months off feels like an eternity in some ways--will have to get back into the habit of what needs doing, when. You'd think that after 250 trials more or less, I'd just know by instinct now.

I'm splurging this weekend and staying in a hotel both Friday and Saturday nights. This is SO different from (a) usually driving out Saturday morning after getting up at 4 a.m. and (b) sleeping in MUTT MVR onsite if weather is halfway decent.

 I justified this because I'm entering only one dog so didn't have to pay Tika's entry fee--actually 2 nights in this hotel is less than the entry would've been (by just a tad). And secondarily because I haven't been to bed before midnight or even later most nights in the last couple of weeks, too much work-work to get done, so expecting to (a) go to bed at 8 this Friday night and be able to fall asleep quickly and (b) get up at 4-dark-fifteen and be able to drive safely on no sleep is just crazy. So, driving out there tomorrow night. I haven't done that in years--slept in a hotel 2 nights OR driven out on Friday instead of Saturday morning.

I will miss seeing the sunrise, though--best part of the morning drive.  Assuming that it's not raining, which looks like it won't be.

I skipped class tonight because I'm SO desperate to get this one document finished. It'll be another late night anyway. This is my break time.

I am SO looking forward to going and hanging out with all the people I like and running my border collie. This is good--means 3 months off was the right tune-up for my attitude.

That is all.



Wednesday, June 13, 2012

USDAA Trial Coming Up

SUMMARY: More stats for this weekend's Woodland trial than you can shake a jump bar at.

  • Driving distance one way: 120 miles (193 km)
  • Driving time one way (est.): 2 hrs 5 mins
  • Gas cost yesterday: $4.09/gal ($1.08/lit ... did I do that right? By what measure do non-USers buy gas?)
  • MUTT MVR's average MPG for the last 3 months: 22.
  • Bridge tolls paid using Fastrak: $5 (northbound only)
  • Extra miles I could drive to avoid a bridge toll: 30
  • Amazing toll that people pulling a trailer will pay starting July 1:  $15 for one axle, $20 for 2. (Guess that's a good reason to buy a gas-guzzling motorhome instead. Stupid.)
  • Maximum freeway speed between here and there: 65 MPH (104 KPH) (or 70 the longer  route).
  • Maximum if you're pulling a trailer: 55. (Another reason to buy a motorhome instead.)
  • Average top speed by personal observation:  70 MPH.
  • Average top speed of people pulling trailers by personal observation: 70 MPH.
  • Event starting time: 7:45 briefings and walkthroughs; 8:00 first dog on the line.
  • Ending time (est): Sat, 5:00; Sun, 3:00
  • Set-up time required (canopy & crating, etc., walk the dogs...): 40 minutes.
  • Time to set on my alarm clock for Saturday morning: 4:20 a.m.
  • Forecast high temperatures: Saturday 99 (37.2 C), Sunday 99-106
  • Total runs for the weekend: 945 in 2 rings (this makes it a medium-ish USDAA trial for around here)
  • Dogs entered: 138. Includes 67  border collies, 17 australian shepherds, 14 mixed breeds (including one Craussie--yay, Tika!)
  • Older dogs competing: One 14-year-old JRT, one 12-year old Cocker, and three 11-year olds (including one Craussie).
  • Humans entered: 98.
  • Percentage of humans handling two dogs: 25%
  • Percentage handling 3 or 4 dogs: 7%
  • Most common dog names (2 each): Charlie, Lily, Neo, Pete
  • Runs I entered with my dogs: 20 (10 each)
  • Entry fees for one dog in all classes:  $144 ($148 C).
  • Work I will do all weekend to reduce my entry fees: Score table chief.
  • Classes I might not run Tika in: Gamblers (because her Q rate is so low), Grand Prix (because 6 runs/day with her in the heat is now probably too much)
  • Qs needed for titles for Tika:
    • Standard: 1 for Gold (35 performance Qs); chances this weekend: 2
    • Snooker: 4 for Gold; chances this weekend: 2
    • LAA-Platinum: 53 of any kind; chances this weekend: up to 10 (I sincerely doubt now that we'll get there, or that she'll still be competing at age 12. We'll see how the year winds down...)
  • Qs needed for titles for Boost:
    • For ADCH (stop me if you've heard this before): one Jumpers and two Snooker Super-Qs; chances this weekend: 2 each
    • Gamblers: 1 for Bronze (15 Qs); chances this weekend: 1
  • Where I will sleep: In  MUTT MVR at the fairgrounds.
  • What I usually have for breakfast: A banana and a high-protein breakfast bar.
  • What I will be hyper aware of this weekend after Elicia Calhoun's disaster (will post more about that eventually):

    This, from the "Live to run again" foundation, is on my driver's-side window:

Thursday, January 26, 2012

Why Discouraged?

SUMMARY: Thinking about Tika's weekends and gnawing on statistics.
I keep thinking, well, Tika did Q 40% (4 of 10 Qable runs) this last weekend, and really, that's nothing terrible. But why does it feel so terrible? I mean, other than all the stupid things that kept us from Qing?

It's because it's feeling like a trend, and I don't like the way the trend is going.

For the 13 months from Sept 2010 to Sept 2011, covering 14 USDAA trials and 170 Qable runs, Tika's average Q rate was 71%. That includes two Regionals, a year apart. And she always brought home multiple placement ribbons. Not always first, but, f'rinstance, at this most recent Labor Day Regional, out of 16 runs against 14 to 18 other dogs, we came home with four 2nds, four 3rds, and four 4ths.

Since then, things seem to be going downhill.

The late-september trial, 55% Qs.
The October trial, 40% Qs.
The November trial, 27% Qs.
December, 44%.
January, 40%. And no placements. Not one. Against half a dozen dogs.

Her Top-Ten point average per day for that 13-month period was 7.3. (Or--oh, wait--it might be higher than that because I didn't count Team top 10s. Huh.) Our average in the 5 trials since that period has dropped to 4.7 per day. Then, this last weekend--nothing. Zilch.

I've known that I've been lucky with Tika. I've known that she's getting older. But has she really gone past her peak and is plummeting that rapidly? Or am I just slacking off?

I think it's good that we've got a bunch of CPE trials coming up--they'll give me another benchmark for how she's doing compared to her average rate in that venue.

Tomorrow, on to more cheery stuff--training with Boost.

Tuesday, October 18, 2011

USDAA, CPE, Precious Weekends, and Precious Dogs

SUMMARY: Big decision #1. What to do?
Here's what I'm thinkin'.

Tika is doing pretty good for a going-on-11 dog. She still tugs full out, still runs full out after the toy or frisbee. But I'm seeing signs that signal "old dog" in so many subtle ways. First, there's the mixed speed in competition--still not entirely positive whether it's soreness, eyes, hearing, or what. Then, around the house, there are little things: She doesn't always immediately stand up when I do any more. She doesn't always get up out of her bed when there's food offered unless she's sure it's worth her while (and this from a dog whose #1 priority will always be food). She's been reluctant to come upstairs for bed at night--not sure whether that's soreness, tired of having Boost scratching off and on all night (me, too), or really is more comfortable on her bed downstairs for some reason. She sometimes does the wrong "trick" when I give her a command, but if I say it louder, she gets it right. Maybe just confusion or lack of practice, maybe hearing. Dunno.

Just things like that.

So I'm pondering what to chase in terms of titles.

My working theory is that she'll continue to be happy and healthy doing agility for another year, and that then, that's probably it for us. I mean, I could get lucky and she'd keep on going--but here are the statistics from our September trial:

Age1234567891011121314Total
# of dogs 9 35 31 56 42 41
(Boost)
39 35 27 14
(Tika)
5 3 2 1 340

The odds aren't good that she'll be going a lot longer. Even another year with her in agility would be precious.

So: Do I cram in as much as I possibly can in one year? Remember that I've discovered that my nonagility weekends are also precious; I've been much happier at 14 weekends a year than I was getting to be at 20-some-odd weekends a year. I'd probably be happier with even less.

CPE choice

A C-ATE (CPE agility something extraspecial, or whatever), which is wayyyyyyyy beyond a championship, requires roughly 250 Qs at the Championship level--that means clean runs, unlike Tika's C-ATCH championship, which required only 20ish Qs (at that time), most of which didn't have to be clean. This makes it like a USDAA LAA silver in number of Qs. However, it's also THE highest title you can get in CPE.

Tika currently has 178 Qs, so needs maybe another 70ish-- Actually it's a bit more involved than that--it requires 5000 points and she currently has 3855, so 1145 to go. There are 7 different classes, worth between 15 and 25 points for each Q. Soooo if we could do all 25-point classes, she'd need only another 46 Qs. Of course they won't all be 25-pointers. So, say, 50-60 Qs to finish.

We've been doing only one or two CPEs a year since I cut back on agility. But Tika's Q rate in CPE is generally pretty high, 80-90%. So *if* we could go to all CPEs that offered 5 classes a day (10/weekend), that would be "only" about 5-7 weekends... hmmmm... but I'm thinkin' that most clubs only offer 8 classes a weekend. That bumps it up to 8-10 more weekends.

Either way, that's a LOT of weekends to add to my dozen USDAAs/year. I don't really want to go back up to 20+ weekends of agility in a year.

However, add to that: It would be nice to earn a championship with Boost, and I think we could do the CPE one in about the same amount of time that Tika could get her CATE. For her C-ATCH, she needs:
1 jumpers
2 jackpot
3 each wildcard and snooker
6 colors
8 standard (and most clubs offer at least 2/weekend)

It's doable. The Colors Qs are the ones that are killing me at the moment. But, still, yes, doable.

I just have to decide I want to do a bunch more expensive CPEs (because I don't get free entries at any of them except bay team's). Now that I've actually punched in the numbers, hmmm, maybe I'll go for it. Of course I'm also trying to get Qs in USDAA for Tika's platinum LAA.

USDAA choice


As I discussed in A Woman, A Plan, A Dog, I figure that in a year with 13 weekends of USDAA, Dogs Willing, we could finish her Platinum LAA. That's THE highest title you can get in USDAA.

I'd like to do that, too.

But 13 weekends of USDAA and 10 weekends of CPE in a year, whoa!, that's as bad as my worst year ever--er, I mean, as many weekends as my busiest agility year ever.

It is true that I could work on the CPE title later; she doesn't have to be as fast, and jumps only 20" rather than 22" in USDAA. Hmmm, and maybe (have to double-check the rules) I could move her to Specialist, which actually jumps 16", and keep going, so concentrate on USDAA first and then go back to CPE. But that pulls me out of my tentative plan to just do agility for another year.

Also, that's a lot to expect from a dog's longevity and health. Plus, really would be nice to have a CH for Boost.

Pondering

So--thinking--



Thursday, September 22, 2011

Here It Comes Again, Lookin' Like a USDAA Trial

SUMMARY: Off to Turlock for the weekend.

Once again, agility boys & girls, the Merle Girls and I will be a-packin' it up at 4:00 Saturday morning and heading 2 hours out to the central valley in the middle of a heat wave for two days of agility.

On the up side, (1) it was as hot in my part of san jose as it was out in that part of the central valley this week, so what does it matter whether we're here or there?, and (2) it's supposed to be cooling down over the weekend.

So I'm hoping it won't even get close to 100 out there, especially with Tika's lower tolerance (apparently) for heat these days.


It's a small trial. Only 4 to 7 dogs in Tika's height class.

Only about 8 dogs in Starters, only about 10 in Advanced.

Fewer than 70 in Masters/P3/Veterans combined. (Well--OK, small is relative, but ya know, there were 187 at the Labor Day trial. Granted, that was a regional, but still--it's all relative.)

Steeplechase, Grand Prix, two each of Standard, Gamblers, Snooker, and Jumpers, and one Pairs Relay.


I've gone back to not practicing anything.

Class tonight--we'll see how my Not Practicing Strategy is paying off.

(Photos courtesy of Matt Mizenko, from the Regional.)

Friday, September 02, 2011

Soutwest Regional Preview a la Taj MuttHall

SUMMARY: Statistics, titles, blah blah blah.

First, of course, the agility wonk combs the Bay Team archives to compare this year's Regional to prior years. Think back! Reminisce on all those fun times!

Number of entries (dogs) is about the same this year as last; runs are more I think because of the addition of the Friday night IHC classes.

YearDogs EnteredRunsDaysRingsSiteJudges
2011 340 3475 3.5 5/4 Manzanita Park Prunedale Tom Shultz, Tammy Domico, Evelyn Robertson, Jessica Ajoux, Leslie Bickel
2010 331 2913 3 5/4 Manzanita Park Michelle DuBois, Tom Kula, Evelyn Robertson, Les Sanders, Karen Gloor
2009* 426 3577 3 5/4 Manzanita Park Scott Chamberlain, Mark Wirant & Sharon Wirant, Adrienne Lynch, Tammy Domico
2008* 484 4183 3 4 Manzanita Park Scott Chamberlain, Mark Wirant & Sharon Wirant, Adrienne Lynch, Karen Gloor, Tammy Domico
2007* 527 4896 3 4 Twin Creeks S'vale Scott Chamberlain, Mark Wirant & Sharon Wirant, Sandra Katzen
2006* 475 4863 3 4 Twin Creeks Scott Chamberlain, Kim Donnell, Frank Holik, Sandra Katzen*, *Scott supv
2005* 467 4348 3 4 Twin Creeks Tom Kula, Peggy Hammond, Merlene Stiles, Jim Hibbard,*Candy Gaiser and Merlene Stiles supv
2004* 415 3939 3 4 Twin Creeks Patty Drom, Jean McKenzie, Debbie Berkley*, Chris Vaught*, *Candy Gaiser and Patty Drom supv
2003 293 2583 3 4 Twin Creeks Janet Gauntt, Frank Holik, Valerie Reiner, Tim Verrelli
2002 335 1260 (?) 3 4 Cal State Hayward Harry Guticz, Lori Montana, Eric Bruce*, Dave Grubel, *Candy Gaiser supv
2001* (non-Reg.) 375 2961 3 3? Cal State Hayward Darlene Woz, Debbie Berkley, Gary Visintainer, Tom Schulz
* West Coast Nationals

And how about this year?

Of the 340 dogs entered, 159 will be Border Collies, one of them a very cute and hopefully not bar-knocking Booster-Girl!

The next-most-common group are the All Americans, 14 of which registered as such, but also these highly individualized designer breeds:
  • 3 Aussie Kelpie
  • 2 Border Kelpie
  • Border Aussie
  • Border Corgi
  • Border Staffy
  • BC/Australian Cattle Dog
  • BC Mix
  • Beagle mix
  • Chihuahua mix
  • Craussie (that would be Teeeeeeka!)
  • Eskie-huahua
  • Pinchippet (min pin/chihuahua/whippet)
  • Rock'n'Roll Retriever
  • Shelt-inu
  • Siberian Bulldozer
  • Sweet L'l Monster
  • Uma Thurman Dog

Weather

We are expected fog and overcast all weekend, woo-hoo, maybe Tika will run fast!

Dogs per group and age

No, no, I'm not going to do all of them...you can go download the interesting statistics list or the running order catalog if you really want to, from The Bay Team's event page.

But I will note that Tika, in P3 22", will be competing in a group of 12 to 17 dogs (hrmhrm top mumble ten points hrmmmm).

Boost's group size is around 80 dogs. Dang 22" Masters.

As for age groups (not an offical group, but fun to note anyway): 41 dogs Boost's age, 14 Tika's age, and only 11 dogs older than Tika (out of the 340 entered). The largest age group is age 4, with 56 dogs.

Ring conflicts

I've been so spoiled by rotation groups, which many clubs use around here for the larger trials (which includes most of ours and SMART's). No conflicts, ever. But last weekend they did NOT run rotation groups, and since they tended to split the rings like this: 22/26" masters and everyone else -- that put Boost and Tika into different groups and I hardly had a moment to sit down. As score table czar, I think I missed two entire classes (run one dog in one ring, run the other in the other ring, run the 2nd one in the first ring, run the first one in the second ring...).

I also managed to miss one walkthrough entirely, and missed another walkthrough later but at least got to walk that one with the different group and just ran my dog late.

This weekend we'll largely be doing rotation groups, but one class each day is split the same way as last weekend, so I'll be back to managing conflicts.

And what about the Merle Girls?

15-16 runs for Tika, 14-15 for Boost (depending on Steeplechase Round 2); Boost didn't earn a single Grand Prix Q all year, so she's not eligible to run Grand Prix this weekend, whereas Tika earned a bye (3 of them, actually) into round 2 so doesn't have to run round 1 at all.

That makes, for me -- ergh-- well, a lot of running and hope the knee & hips continue to hold up, is all I can say! And we didn't even sign up for the two classes offered on Friday night.

Possible titles:
  • Tika: Perf Snooker Champion Silver (one needed, two chances)
  • Boost: Standard Champion Bronze (one needed, two chances)
  • Boost: Snooker Master (two super-Qs needed, two chances) (I must add, "when heck freezes over")
  • Boost: Jumpers Master (two needed, two chances) (and, yeh, ditto)
  • Boost: If she completes the latter two--ADCH. (Gosh, how weird to even be able to say that it's within statistical possibility, because for so long it hasn't been! Of course when I say "within statistical possibility," in this case it's like the statistical possibility of Tika fetching the newspaper on command...well, OK, actually, it's more likely than that. But that still doesn't make it very likely.)
OK, Agility Boys and Girls, that's plenty for now. Wishing you all a wonderful Labor Day weekend.

Monday, August 29, 2011

Stats From The Weekend

SUMMARY: An assortment of numbers and points.
This might not be very useful because I hardly ever do it, but it is worthwhile to me because it shows how very few issues Boost had this weekend.

Boost

Qty DoneIssues/ NumbersNotes
Weaves101oddball pop in the very middle
Dogwalk60Still 2o/2o over side instead of end, though
Aframe90
Teeter53Came off middle 2x, left w/out going to bottom 1
Start-line stay110
Barslots3Pairs, gamble opening, Std--double on bad front X
Runout/ refusal- 92 in Sat jumpers, 2 in Sun jumpers not "legal" ref's so didn't count, 1 relay so still Qed, 1 snooker closing, 1 gmbl closing, 2 GP
Other faults1Offcourse in Sat's jumpers after already 2 runouts, handler issue
Tables21elbowwwwwws
Q-able Runs10 (out of 11)4 QsPairs, Std, Jump, Stplchase
Steeplechase Rd 26th seed$182nd place!
Top Ten placements9 possible2Stplch 2nd, jumpers 3rd
Titles1 possible0

Tika

Qty DoneIssues/ NumbersNotes
Weaves80
Dogwalk60
Aframe80
Teeter51Inexplicable abandon in gmbl
Start-line stay110
Barslots 1Snooker 1st red
Runout/ refusal - 0
Tables20
Other faults1backjumped snooker red#2
Q-able Runs108 Qsmissed snooker, one gamblers
Steeplechase Rd 23rd seed$92nd place
Top Ten placements9 possible7Stplch 2nd, GP 1st, Std 2nd & 3rd, jumpers 2nd & 2nd, gamblers 2nd, (also pairs 3rd)
Titles2 possible1PF Jumpers Ch Silver

Prednisone

  • Stops itching: Check
  • Drinks more: Check
  • Pees more: Check
  • More restless: Check
  • Stops dropping bars and starts going ahead to jumps instead of turning back: ...huh?! (She'll still be on pred for this coming weekend's 3-day Regional. Will be interesting to see how that looks. And then will be interesting to see what happens when it's all done with.)

Saturday, June 11, 2011

I Have A Database And I'm Not Afraid To Use It

SUMMARY: Just going over some USDAA numbers for my own entertainment, Tika amazes me, and I finally do something about Boost.
Tika has Qed in 18 of the last 21 gamblers. This amazes me. So yes, you, too, can go from sitting in a corner crying because you've only gotten, like, one gamble out of the last 30 with 2 dogs (11 years ago--this also amazes me) to actually getting gambles.

Boost has gotten only 4 of the last 21 gamblers.

Tika has Qed 16 of the last 21 jumpers. This amazes me. So you, too, could go--same dog--from 21 novice/starters jumpers with no Qs before you get the one that you need to move to advanced--get that one advanced immediately--then take 13 tries in masters to get your one jumpers Q for your MAD... to Top Ten Performance Jumpers. (6 years later.)

I'm still waiting for that miracle transformation for Boost in Jumpers. The count now is 67 masters attempts with 2 Qs to show for it.

Tika's qualifying rate for the last year is 66%. Out of her last 100 runs, her Q rate is 72%--and over the last 4 trials, 81%. In USDAA! This just amazes me, period. I can't believe this will continue like this, but it's nice while it lasts.

Boost--well--Sigh. But she sure is cute.

I did get a private lesson this week and I'm jazzed about the specific things that I now can work on. And we adjusted what we did in class Thursday night, too, to avoid things that invoke our problem spots, and we did pretty good (that means not running exactly the same course as everyone else, tweaking one or two places).

Next trial isn't until the first weekend in July, so we have a chance to make progress if I keep up my motivation.

Saturday, January 08, 2011

Taj MuttHall Year In Review: 2010

SUMMARY:  Agility statistics and observations for the year.

I did this last year, so I suppose it would be consistent to do it again.

Trials competed in: 13. Wow, a big drop even from last year (16), and wonderfully down from my high of 23 in 2003. So continued that progress towards Less Agility And More Everything Else.
  • CPE: 1 trial. I did this one because it was Bay Team hosted, I was working score table, and it was within about 30 minutes from home. I wanted to focus on USDAA. Now I'm thinking that maybe I should do more CPE this year, and less USDAA, to allow The Booster and me to have a few more successes and earn a few more ribbons. Heck, maybe someday she could get her C-ATCH. At least it would be *a* championship.
  • USDAA: 12 trials, one of which was only 1 day. (Same as 2009.)

Runs: 304 (that's weird--why is that much higher than 2009? Did I miscalculate last year?)
  • Tika: 155 (145 Qable*), 93 of them Qs (64%--that's pretty good in USDAA, I think!)
  • Boost: 149 (146 Qable*), 34 Qs (23%)
  • CPE: 16 runs, 14 Qs
  • USDAA: 288 runs (275 Qable), 113 Qs (many more runs than last year. I must've had dogs out a *lot* for medical reasons last year)
*Round 2 of Steeplechase isn't Qable, for example. And that's also the main difference in the number of runs between Boost and Tika for the year.

Tika titles earned: 
PD3 Performance Dog (= Perf. MAD) 4/17/10 Dixon
ATD-bronze Accomplished Tournament-bronze (15 Perf. tournament Qs with at least 3 in  each) 4/17/10 Dixon
PJ3 Perf 3 Jumpers (=Jumpers Master, 5 Qs) 4/18/10 Dixon
ARD Acc. Relay Dog (=RMCh, 10 Qs) 4/18/10 Dixon
AKD Acc. Snooker Dog (=SMCh, 10 Qs) 4/18/10 Dixon
AGD Acc. Gambler Dog (=GMCh, 10 Qs) 4/24/10 Manzanita Park
APD Acc. Performance Dog (= Perf. ADCH!) 4/24/10 Manzanita Park
LAA-silver Lifetime Agility Award--250 Qs in Masters and Tournaments spread across all classes 4/24/10 Manzanita Park
AJD Acc. Jumpers Dog (=JMCh, 10 Qs) 7/17/10 Carmel
ARD-Bronze Acc. Relay Dog-Bronze (15 Qs) 8/28/10 Manzanita Park
ASD Acc. Standard Dog (10 Qs) 9/5/10 Manzanita Park
AKD-Bronze Acc. Snooker Dog-Bronze (15 Qs) 9/6/10 Manzanita Park
AGD-bronze Acc Gamblers Dog-bronze (15 Qs) 9/11/10 Turlock

    Boost titles earned: 

    RCH-Bronze Relay Champion-Bronze (15 Qs) 2/13/10 Turlock
    MAD Master Agility Dog 4/16/10 Dixon
    SACh Standard Champion (10 Qs in Standard) 7/17/10 Carmel
    GCh Gamblers Champion (10 Qs) 7/18/10 Carmel
    TM-Bronze Tournament Master-Bronze --15 Qs with at least 3 in each of the 3 tournament classes 8/28/10Manzanita Park

    Class Q percentage
    Tika Boost
    Gamblers 64% 23%
    Standard 48% 8%
    Snooker 55% 20%
    Jumpers 65% 10%
    Relay 93%** 64%**
    Steeplechase 73% 23%
    Grand Prix 30% 0%
    DAM overall (3 tournaments this year) 100% 66%
    DAM individual classes (std/snk/gamb/jmp) 83% 25%
    ** In relay, faults don't disqualify you if you and/or teammate are fast enough to make it up in time. Hence, much higher Q rate for fast dogs who knock bars, for example!

    Notes:
    • Tika went from APD (performance championship, 5 Qs in each class and tournaments) in April to ALMOST APD-Bronze in November (15 Qs in each class and tournaments--just missing one Jumpers and one Standard Q!)

    • Tika again qualified for Nationals in all three Performance tournaments (Steeplechase, Grand Prix, and Team); as you know, for the 2nd year I opted not to go.
    • Boost qualified for the Nationals in Steeplechase and DAM Team.
    • Of Tika's 17 performance Snooker Qs so far, 13 have been Super-Qs. Percentages I'd only ever dreamed about in Championship!
    • Boost earned her FIRST-EVER Master Jumpers Q in April to complete her MAD... and actually managed a SECOND one in November. Who knows, maybe someday we'll also get a Snooker Super-Q.
    • Boost qualified in Steeplechase 3 times again this year--and for the first time, in one Round 2, actually placed and brought home a little tiny check.
    • Our collective Grand Prix Qs for this year, however, were dismal: Tika 3 for 10 and Boost 0 for 10. How come we can get Standard Qs but not Grand Prixs? I don't think the courses are harder than the Standards. (Well--hmmm, sort of: Boost 3 for 29 in Standard, Tika 13 for 29.)
    • Tika finished in the Top Ten in all four Performance classes this year! I am *so* excited (if you didn't already know). Final numbers aren't in, but with only a couple of weekends of numbers missing, she's 6th in Gamblers, 4th in Jumpers, 4th in Snooker, and 5th in Standard. (There is also a Top Ten for Performance Tournaments now; however, thanks largely to our dismal Grand Prix numbers, I don't think we'll even show up in the top 25 (not currently posted).)

    Monday, October 11, 2010

    Tournament Silver and other Tournament Statistics

    SUMMARY: Tika's new title plus mining my database for tournament minutiae.
    Oh, yeah: Because Tika Qed in Steeplechase, that completed her Performance Tournament Master Silver title (25 Qs with at least 5 in each of the 3 tournaments). It took her 4 years and 4 months to complete her Championship TM Silver; it has taken 1 year and 6 months for her Performance equivalent.

    Tika's Grand Prix History

    I felt a bit of a pang when admiring a friend's Bye certificate from winning Grand Prix this weekend. (For regular-weekend Grand Prixs like these, a Bye cert gets you into Round 2 at a Regional.) With all of Tika's Grand Prix Qs in her life--37 to date--she has never won a Grand Prix and never earned a Bye certificate.

    Wellll, OK, neither of those are strictly true statements.

    Because Tika *did* win one Grand Prix--Round 1 at a Regional. Which doesn't get you a **certificate** because you're at a regional so you just go on to round 2 the next day anyway.

    Oh, and there is another way to get into Round 2 at a Regional, and that is by Qing in Round 1 at a Regional. Which, in fact, Tika has done 6 out of 8 times. So the result is exactly the same as having a cert from an earlier trial; it's just that--jeez--it would be nice to have one of those certificates on our record plus one of those fancy Grand Prix first-place ribbons (which you don't get by winning Round 1).

    She's placed 2nd five times. (Three times in Championship, twice in Performance.)

    Her Qing rate is odd recently. After she moved to performance last spring, she Qed in 6 out of her first 7 Grand Prixs. And since then--only 2 out of 10. Gotta pick up my game, obviously!

    It's a little hard to compare to her Championship record: Virtually all the time she was in Championship, you could Q with 5 faults, and she Qed 29 out of 47 times. But 20 of those were with 5 faults--ouch!

    So in Performance, those first 6 Qs were all clean runs, and since then she's had 2 more clean, which is just about as many in a year and a half as she had in 6 years in Championship! Meanwhile, 4 of her 9 performance NQs have been 5-faulters, so in the old days those would also have been Qs. Ah, well. Not too worried about it yet.

    But just in case I WANT to worry about something--

    Boost's Grand Prix History and other sad stories

    To add to the general feeling that I'm rushing madly nowhere with Boost, she's earned only 3 Grand Prix Qs out of 41 tries.

    Not quite as bad as 1 Jumpers Q out of 56 tries, or zero Snooker Super-Qs out of 52 tries, but the three of these combined makes for a good excuse to get depressed and give up the sport forever.

    What it SHOULD do is serve as a motivator for me to more regularly do the things that I know I could probably do to probably improve the situation, but for some reason those all fall into the category of Not Interesting Enough. I know what Susan Garrett (and everyone else who's successful at this sport) would say about that, and I can say it in my own words: Do something about it or quit whining and just enjoy being out on the field with your dog doing what you're capable of doing.

    Bleah. I hate good advice that makes sense but actually involves work or ceasing whining.

    I mean, she DOES have 7 Steeplechase Qs, which Tika only ever got 11 of in Championship, and she has 22 Pairs Qs, which Tika only ever got 27 of in Championship.

    And I'm not too unhappy with 10 out of 70ish Standard Qs or 10 out of 60ish Gamblers.

    But, really, I was in despair over Remington's failure to get more than one Standard Q out of 41 attempts, and that pales in comparison to Boost's unachievements. Or his only-one Gamblers Q out of 29 attempts (between NADAC and USDAA) that had me sitting in a corner sobbing pathetically on more than one occasion.

    Of course now I'm older and wiser and don't tend to go sob in a corner over missing Qs. But, frankly, if it weren't for Tika, I dunno whether I'd have the strength of will to keep going in agility at this rate with Boost. Or, conversely, whether that would in fact motivate me more to do something about it.

    And in conclusion

    Have you heard all this before? Probably. Like a broken record.

    OK, this was supposed to be a 2-line post about Tika's Pf Tournament Silver. Now it's back to the real world.

    Friday, October 08, 2010

    USDAA Titles by Breed--Fun!

    SUMMARY: Those unusual breeds in agility.
    This morning, I'm STILL looking at the USDAA title stats by breed page. Although any minute now I'll get back to (a) packing, (b) billable work, (c) exercising the dogs, (d) procrastinating in some other pointless way.

    You can pick some unusual breeds and check the info. Like:

    American Foxhound? There's a huuuuuuuuuuge list of titles that have been won by this breed--from 1 to 4 of them for any title, and 3 of those four are Candy Gaiser's. (She's a Bay Area competitor.)

    American Hairless Terrier? Bet you didn't even know there was such a breed! One young lady has actually put titles on three of them!

    Barbets? No titles ever! (Might be different in AKC, dunno, but apparently USDAA's database is READY just in case any one of the 2 Barbet owners in the known universe decides to do agility.)

    Basset Hound: Not a breed one can usually picture as being agile. But a couple of hardy souls have tried, although none progressed passed starters in the Championship track, and only a couple past starters in the Peformance track--in fact are doing well in some areas at the P3 (performance masters level) but have not yet managed to earn a championship. That's dedication!

    Beauceron: Another uncommon breed, a big working dog. I thought to check only because Channan Fosty, Bay Teamer and National Champion and World Team member with her fabulous BC Icon, started out in agility with a Beauceron but didn't go far with him in USDAA; not sure why, as he in fact earned his championship in AKC agility. Only one Beauceron has ever earned a USDAA Championship, and I can't imagine there are many in AKC, either.

    Bernese Mountain Dog: They're big dogs and can be kinda lumbering, but Bay Team's Katie Tolve ran hers to the only Berner ADCH in history to date, and man, could that dog run! Fast and eager and graceful! This breed is greatly handicapped by tending to die of cancer at 5 or 6 years of age. Kintla made it to 8.

    Border Collie: 1,148 have earned their Jumpers Masters (5 Qs) titles to date. Hear that, O Boost who can't get more than one?! On the other hand, only 740 have earned their Gamblers Champion (10 Qs), and 427 their Relay Champion Bronze (15 Qs) and Boost managed those. Huh. I guess we're inside out, which makes Boost an unusual breed.

    OK, really, one could look for interesting stories all through here, but--ahem--I'm rather busy and don't have time. The rest of the breeds are left as an exercise for the student.

    So--what's your favorite breed and story or observation about their USDAA stats?

    Thursday, October 07, 2010

    USDAA Titles by Breed

    SUMMARY: Dinking around on the USDAA site again.
    I'm not sure how I ended up here, but it's fun to see that, when Tika earned her Tournament Platinum, she was only the 10th-ever All-Breed (All-American, Mixed Breed, what have you) to do so, and now remains one of only 16 All-Breeds ever. Compare that to, say, only 321 dogs of any breed (205 of which are Border Collies).

    (That's 50 Championship Tournament Qs, BTW.)

    It's also interesting to note how the number of dogs dwindles as the titles get higher and require more (I suppose that's obvious, but still--). For example for *all* breeds, here's how many dogs have earned the Standard titles progression:
    • Starters Standard: 4,948  (3 Starters Std Qs)
    • Advanced Standard: 3,117 (3 Adv Qs)
    • Standard Agility Master: 2,764 (5 masters Qs)
    • Standard Champion: 1,559 (10 mast Qs)
    • Standard Ch Bronze: 1,007 (15 mast Qs)
    • Standard Ch Silver: 506 (25 mast Qs)
    • Standard Ch Gold: 295 (35 mast Qs)
    • Standard Ch Platinum: 157 (50 mast Qs)
    Tika got up to Silver, but then I moved her over to Performance, so the count restarted at the Standard Agility Master level equivalent and she has to work her way up again. She's almost at Accomplished Standard Bronze. Maybe this year.  (Already has Gamblers, Snooker, and Relay Bronze in Performance, but not quite Standard or Jumpers.)

    And have I ever mentioned that the first Australian Shepherd (which Tika was originally registered as) to earn her USDAA Agility Dog Championship was named Tika? (See this and use the "go to" to go to the last page.)

    So anyway, back to Tika; among All-Americans, she's one of only:
    • 21 to earn ADCH Silver
    • 33 to earn Standard Champion Silver
    • 55 to earn Snooker Champion Silver
    • 25 to earn Relay Champion Silver
    • 42 to earn Jumpers Champion Silver
    • 26 to earn Gamblers Champion Silver
    • 22 to earn Accomplished Gambler Bronze (that's the Performance version)
    • 7 to earn Accomplished Relay Bronze (huh, why is performance relay so hard? Not enough dogs competing in some areas?)
    • 51 to earn Accomplished Snooker Bronze (hey--why does everyone complain about Snooker being so hard?)
    • 29 to earn Accomplished Tournament Bronze
    • If she picks up a Steeplechase or Grand Prix this weekend, one of 10 Accomplished Tournament Silver
    Compare to 366 who earned their Starters Standard or 356 who earned their P1 Standard.

    And compare THAT to  1825 Border Collies who earned their Starters Standard or 360 who earned their P1 Standard.  Hm! Interesting that the P1 numbers are about the same as for All-Americans.

    OK, I was going to go to bed early, but noooo, it was statistics suck (like tunnel suck for dogs). Now I'm off.

    Tuesday, August 31, 2010

    Southwest Regionals: A look back

    SUMMARY: It's small, for a big trial.
    Updates!: Got more info from Karey and my own research later the same day, in red like this, and lots of tweaks throughout that I didn't mark. Basically the article is the same, just some dates are adjusted.

    This weekend in Prunedale California, the Bay Team hosts its 8th annual USDAA Southwestern (Major) Regional dog agility trial. Before the Major Regionals existed, however, the Bay Team had been hosting Labor Day weekend trials since 1995. Their content, size, and location have varied over the years, and it's fun to sometimes look back and remember how things used to be.

    Note: Prior to 2003, the Regional qualifiers for each Tournament were held in different locations on different dates, and the Bay Team hosted one each year for a couple or three years. Herein, I'm talking about the Major Regionals started in 2003, in which all three Tournament events occur.

    Tournament offered

    From 1995 through 2002 (before Major Regionals), the various clubs in central California rotated the local tournament classes. Each year, one club hosted a Grand Prix, one hosted a Steeplechase, and one hosted a Dog Agility Masters (DAM) Tournament. To our modern agility minds, that seems so odd; all these same clubs now offer both Grand Prix and Steeplechase at virtually every trial, and there are maybe half a dozen DAMs during the year as well.

    So, in 1996, 1998, and 2001, we offered a DAM at our Labor Day trial; in 1999, it was a Steeplechase; and in 2000, because of the Nationals the next weekend (see below), we offered no tournaments at all that weekend.

    Of course, qualifying for nationals has changed dramatically as well. In 1996, for example, you could still qualify for Nationals in Grand Prix with a single Q, and you could get that single Q with as many as 10 faults. Then it changed to 7 faults, then 5 faults, then to two clean-run Qs. Therefore, people need more attempts to earn those requisite scores.

    That first Major Regional, in 2003, when we were required to host ALL THREE TOURNAMENTS IN ONE WEEKEND, OH MY GOSH!, raised quite a controversy. We'd never even hosted all three tournaments in a single YEAR before! It would be too much work, too  complicated, people wouldn't want that much stress on the weekend, too hard to handle all the special awards...  You get the picture.

    Who knew we'd be doing this for 8 years running, with no  end in sight! Yep,  we cheerfully run that complicated, stressful, impossible  slate of classes every Labor Day without a whimper.  Well--maybe one or two whimpers here and there; this isn't an easy trial, but the processes are pretty well  understood and we have many enthusiastic and experienced members who see to all the details. Thanks Dog for that!

    Location

    In the heavily populated area where the majority of Bay Teamers live, vast swaths of grass or large arenas are hard to come by. In 1995 and 1996, the Labor Day trial used a small field in Daly City and shared a parking lot with the local library. The next year we moved to Cal State Hayward (CSUH, now Cal State East Bay) on the big lawn next to Meiklejohn Hall. Parking wasn't convenient and it was hard to get vehicles on and off the lawn for unloading.

    In our eternal quest for a better space, we managed to get the 1998 trial onto the Stanford campus. Stanford has miles of lush, green lawns crying out for dog agility. We had a great spot until a couple of days before the trial, when someone getting married on campus insisted that their wedding not have a view of dog agility, and we were unceremoniously and abruptly dumped to a tiny lawn between a busy street and some residence units. 6:00 a.m. weekend dogs didn't mix well with the sleepers.

    That was our only trial ever to be televised--what a mess! Although it was fun afterward to be on T.V. for 30 seconds (Jake and me after our DAM relay run),  the huge delays in classes while the TV crew set things up the way they wanted made the days drag on much longer than expected; we couldn't use the loudspeakers while they were running the cameras (which was during most of the classes); and we had to wait at the ends of classes for them to interview folks coming off the field.

    The next two years, 1999 and 2000, we were back at Meiklejohn, but then the campus wanted to build there. We moved to the CSUH soccer practice field for 2001 and 2002. That had more space, but was inconveniently laid out and had challenging parking and access. We never held a major Retional there.

    Then we were able to negotiate to use the soccer fields at the Twin Creeks Softball complex in the heart of Silicon Valley, making it delightfully convenient for a large number of Bay Team members. The space was huge, but overnight parking was always iffy; the management team changed frequently and we got different stories at different times; their rules and restrictions were a bit of a thorn in our side at times; and when listening to their rates, we always heard ka-ching! ka-ching! Still, that's where we held our first major Regional, and we easily fit there for five years of Regionals, from 2003 to 2007.

    We might still have been there, except that in 2008, after confirming our trials for the year, management abruptly changed and confirmed that the long-rumored additional softball fields would be built on *our* soccer fields and that they were no longer available.

    Meanwhile, SMART had found Manzanita Park in Prunedale. The facilities are vast, nowhere near anyone's residence, and not too expensive. Our Labor Day trials have been there since 2008.

    Number of rings

    Our first Labor Day trial, in 1995, had only two rings. The following year, because USDAA didn't allow entry limits and entries had been growing in this still-new dog sport, we bumped it up to three rings. The arguments that ensued when three whole rings were proposed--oh, my! It was already hard to find workers, people were already encountering ring conflicts, it was already too stressful, it was too hard to manage. But the club did it, and it worked out just fine, and it wasn't long until all our trials ran 3 rings.

    In 2000, the USDAA Nationals moved to California, and we anticipated a huge draw to our trial because it was the weekend immediately preceding the Nationals. Rather than cancel it, we cut it back to two days (the only time we've done that for Labor Day). The next year, Nationals was later in the month, but our trial was so popular (in addition to being a Regional Steeplechase qualifier that year), that it was proposed that we bump ours up to four whole rings. The arguments that ensued--oh, my! It was already hard to find workers, people were already encountering ring conflicts, it was already too stressful, it was too hard to manage... Yeah, we know.

    So we did four rings, and it worked reasonably well (rotation groups introduced several years later really helped) and we continued to do four-ring trials until we moved to Manzanita Park in 2008--where we threw in, yes, a fifth ring on one of the 3 days, which has helped enormously with rotation groups.

    Number of runs & dogs

    Sometimes it's hard to say why the numbers grow or fall they way they do. Of course the number of runs could vary with how many classes we offer, but we've been pretty consistent with that through our years of regionals.

    Our last pre-Regional Labor Day trial, in 2001 (the 2nd year of Nationals in southern California), we had 2961 runs.

    In 2002 and 2003, the Nationals moved to Texas.

    In 2004 through 2009, the Nationals were in Scottsdale, which Californians generally considered to be a "local" trial, so not surprisingly the Regional numbers jumped way up. The Bay Team Regionals were the last before the Nationals each year, so we expected, and generally got, huge entries.

    Amazing, looking back at the number of runs (including Round 2 of Grand Prix or Steeplechase except of course for this year):

    yeardogsrunsRingsRegional?LocationNationals in--
    20103312835+round2's5YPrunedaleKentucky
    200942637825YPrunedaleScottsdale
    200848441835YPrunedaleScottsdale
    200752748964YTwin CrksScottsdale
    200647548634YTwin CrksScottsdale
    200546843484YTwin CrksScottsdale
    200441541434YTwin CrksScottsdale
    200329325834YTwin CrksTX
    20023351260?4**CSUH soccerTX
    200137929334-CSUH soccerDel Mar, CA
    20003141503*3-CSUH Meik.Del Mar, CA
    199933223993-CSUH Meik.
    199821817313-Stanford
    1997~10003-CSUH Meik.
    1996~138~8703-Daly City
    19952-Daly City
    * 2000: Only 2 days, no Tournaments

    ** regional for one tournament only

    Not sure why the drop in 2008 and again in 2009; we offered the same number of classes, but Pairs  moved to Friday evening, which might have been part of (but not nearly all) of the drop.

    My own thoughts are that (a) the economy played a part in what people could afford, and (b) people were self-selecting out of going to the Nationals and so weren't as concerned about picking up Regional runs.

    This year, the 2835 number is the lowest that we've had since our abbreviated trial in 2000! But it's not unexpected, now that Nationals have moved back towards the east.

    This should make for a relaxed weekend--at least compared to some of our most jam-packed prior Labor Day weekends--and I can use some relaxing at a trial! See you all there.

    Monday, March 01, 2010

    Now What?

    SUMMARY: Losing it about agility. A longish and introspective post.
    Friends know that I've been saying for several years that I'm doing too much agility and I miss my old life and I'm going to cut back on the agility.

    Well, I have...from a high of 23 weekends in 2003 down to 18 last year. Last year was tough because a couple of those weekends were because the dog or dogs were injured or other oddball reasons, and I was sad and frustrated at the time.

    But, as weekends have gone by, with and without agility, and has the "without" weekends have at first hurt but then became gifts of free time, I have come more and more to realize:

    • How much I hate getting up at 4 in the morning.
    • How much I resent agility taking almost all my vacation days.
    • How stressed I am trying to get in full weeks of work around agility weekends; there is no time for me, ever, it seems.
    • How much I like being around my house and yard with NOTHING SCHEDULED except maybe a movie with a friend.
    • How much I can catch up on, or just relax and enjoy, in a weekend at home.
    • How relaxed I feel during the week when there's no trial the following weekend.
    • How much I enjoy doing things OTHER than agility, like I always used to BEFORE agility.
    • How much happier I am to have money to spend on something other than agility once in a while.
    • How tired I am of fine-tuning dogs' agility performance. I mean, I *tried* to start Boost right, like with Susan Salo's approach to learning jumping. Maybe didn't do as much of it as I should have, because at some point she started knocking those bars, and now it's drudgery for me to try to fix it. I know all the advice that says that you should make ways to make training fun for you as well as for the dog, but, well, OK, it isn't.
    • How crushed I was at deciding--because of Tika's on-again off-again pains and aches-- not to take Tika to the nationals in Performance although she'd had an excellent year...and regretting it and regretting it and regretting it... until she came up injured at that trial just a couple of weeks after when Nationals would have been, completely justifying my reluctance to go. And suddenly it was like I'd been let free from something I'd thought I was chasing. Of course it helps that the USDAA Nationals aren't within driving distance any more.

    I've felt that I was coming to this point for a very long time, and I'm starting to think that I'm actually here: I want most of agility out of my life.

    We'll see how I do when the USDAA trials start coming fast and furious later in the year. I still want to do some, just REALLY not 18 weekends a year of it!

    Which leaves me with the question: So, what do I do with these crazy driven dogs who love agility for so many reasons? I mean, I love agility, too. I've developed such an amazing rapport with all of my agility dogs that I never had with them as pets--and I was pretty close with my "merely" pet dogs. Agility keeps me physically active, which is crucial for me. It burns off their energy. It gives us an excuse to really focus on each other individually. And I've met so many wonderful people whom I now consider my friends--although I almost never see any of them except at agility events. Because they're all always doing agility! There are a lot of laughs and good times in agility.

    I'm thinking that, if I take a weekend and don't do agility, I should do somehting else with them. Like, drive an hour to a park where they can run off leash and spend 2 or 3 hours hiking and drive back. Of course, there goes half a day of my weekend right there, and it might very well be a solitary effort rather than with dozens of friends who are all interested in each other and each other's dogs.

    Conversely, there's a lot of pain in agility. Dogs die. People's goals are thwarted (mine, too). People and dogs injured. This is all really a very small part of agility, but at times now it feels constant constant constant, and maybe that's a sign of where I am, that the pain grows instead of simply being dips in the background from which one recovers.

    I had decided not to do any agility in March... easy enough because it's just 2 of the 4 or so CPE trials I had figured on doing for the year... and now I find that I am looking towards the 4-day trial in April both with excitement (it's a big, fun, exciting event) and trepidation (it's four frigging days of agility).

    I dunno. I'm trying to take some time off from agility. I'm trying not to think "but my dogs are getting older and their agility lives are short." I'm trying to remember that, by the time these dogs are gone (gods willing), I'll be in my mid-60s. My arthritic knees aren't getting any better. MY life is going to be short enough, no matter how long it is. I have so much else I want to do in my life and I'm not getting it done.

    I think I'm thinking out loud. I think I'm coming to where 230 weekends of agility competition (not to mention seminars and fun matches and classes) over 14 years have just worn out their welcome.

    I started agility classes for something fun to do with Remington because he needed more exercise and more of a mental workout than simply tricks and playing in the yard were giving him. It certainly did that. I had never intended to compete, just keep going to classes every week for the fun. Don't know whether I could go back to just that.

    Anyway--feels like I'm at a crossroad and I'm not yet entirely sure which direction I'm headed. There will be agility--heck, Tika and I could try again this year for Top Ten!--heck, Boost might actually someday earn a Jumpers Q and her MAD title! (I've almost given up on a championship)--but, like any addict, I'm trying to find a way to do it in true moderation without going cold turkey. Don't know whether that's possible.

    Ah, well, yes, Scarlett, tomorrow is another day!

    List of competition weekends and number of runs each

    Click to see larger images.

    Wednesday, December 30, 2009

    Taj MuttHall Year In Review: 2009

    SUMMARY: Statistics and observations for the year.

    Trials competed in: 16. My lowest number since 2000 (with a high of 23 in 2003). So made some progress on my vow to do less agility and more of The Rest of Life.
    • CPE: 4 trials, one of which was only 1 day. Tika didn't participate in 2 because she was sore. Boost didn't participate in one because she was sore.
    • USDAA: 12 trials, one of which was only 1 day.

    Runs: 270
    • Tika: 139, 76 of them Qs
    • Boost: 131, 30 Qs
    • CPE: 42, 32 Qs
    • USDAA: 228, 74 Qs

    Tika titles earned:
    • GCH-Silver (Gamblers Champion silver, 25 Qs in championship)
    • TM-Platinum (Tournament master platinum, 50 Qs with at least 10 in each tournament class)
    • SACH-Silver (Standard champion silver, 25 Qs)
    • PR3 - Performance3 Relay (equals RM in championship, 5 Qs)
    • ATD - Accomplished Tournament Dog (equals TM in championship, 10 Qs with at least 2 in each of the 3 tournament classes)
    • PK3 - Perf 3 Snooker (equals SM)
    • JCH-Silver (Jumpers Champion silver, 25 Qs)
    • ADCH-Silver (equals 5 ADChs -- 25 Qs in each of 5 regular classes plus tournaments)
    • PG3 -  Perf 3 Gamblers (equals GM)
    Boost titles earned:
    • CPE CL4-S (strategy games, level 4)
    • RCH (relay champion--10 Qs)
    • GM (gamblers master--5 Qs)
    • SAM (standard agility master--5 Qs)
    • TM (Tournament master--10 Qs with at least 2 in each of the 3 tournament classes)

    Notes:
    • Tika earned all those P3 titles only between March and September, moving gradually into Perf as she completed silver in each Championship classs.
    • After only 6 months in Performance, Tika is just one Standard Q away from her PD3 (MAD equivalent) and actually needs only 3 standards and 4 Jumpers for her APD (ADCH equivalent).
    • Tika qualified for Nationals in all three tournaments (Steeplechase, Grand Prix, and Team)--in BOTH championship and Performance!
    • Of Tika's 6 performance Snooker Qs so far, 5 have been Super-Qs.
    • Boost qualified in Steeplechase 3 times this year--which is 3x more than she had qualified in her entire preceding agility career. ( I mean, before 2009, she had only ever qualified once.)
    • Boost might hold the record for the most consecutive Masters Jumpers runs with no Q (36). But we keep coming very close--might get some someday!

    Buster Cubes cracked open: 1 (as of this morning. Congratulations, butthead Boost.)

    Monday, September 28, 2009

    About Tika

    SUMMARY: May I brag? And list some statistics, too?
    Just occurred to me: Hmmm, OK, Tika has been in Performance only since the end of April, but she's done very well in Steeplechase, Grand Prix, and Snooker, and I wonder where she shows up in the Top Ten listings? So I go to the USDAA page and look:

    Heh, cool. I know we won't hold this (especially after this past weekend's Snooker disaster, and especially because I'm not planning on doing that many more trials this year, and also because who's likely to beat us at most trials? Hobbes and Brenn), but it's always fun to see our name in lights: Top Ten Performance 22" Snooker as of roughly the end of August.

    Although, oh, interesting:
    • According to my records, in the last 3 trials we've earned another 13 points that aren't on there (but then, so has probably everyone else).
    • Out of Tika's 8 P3 Snooker runs, four have been Super-Qs (jeez, wish we could'a done that in Championship!).
    • Because I mucked up something in my database, I just realized that Tika earned her P3 Snooker title LAST trial! Woot all over again!

    Not bad, for only a partial year. Not bad, for a dog who took 36 tries to get her first 3 Super-Qs in Championship.

    How about Tournament Top Ten? Pfah, nothing listed on the web site that I see. But she has Qed in 6 out of 7 Performance Grand Prixs to date, and 5 out of 7 Steeplechase. Not bad, for a dog who Qed in only 11 out of the 42 Championship-level Steeplechases she entered--almost all the non-Qs with 5, and sometimes 10, faults. Now we're clean. Go figure. We like 22".

    So how is my challenging, attention-deficit, fun-loving and now-getting-reliable Tika girl doing in comparison to other dogs? According to this USDAA page:
    • Only 192 dogs have ever earned the Silver ADCH.
    • Only 247 dogs have ever earned their Tournament Master Platinum.
    • If/when Tika finishes her LAA-Silver (only, hrm, 28 Qs to go), that's be one of only -- uh-- don't know because that's not listed on that page or anywhere that I'm finding. Gol dang.
    Compare that to 9,946 dogs who have ever earned their Agility Dog (Novice) title, and who knows how many more who've competed some and never gotten even that far.

    I think we're doing pretty OK.

    Tika's Round 2 Steeplechase run from Sunday. Fairly smooth, not super-fast. It's 7:30 in the morning and we're starting behind the jump right in the center of the video, and I lead out towards the left.
    My only real handling faux pas is that I was going to go for a front cross before the blue tunnel but wimped out--which was stupid, because I ended up coming to a complete stop and waiting for her, so I had plenty of time to get there and probably would've eked another second or so of speed out of things. Not sure it would've mattered--1st place dog was 4 seconds faster.